A Short Synopsis

A Short Synopsis.

1 John 2:16 "For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world."

Everything in life is about the Father. Everything.

A short synopsis (if that is even possible). Your life is all about your Father and His authority, which directly effects your behavior. From the creation of Adam to the end of eternity it is all about the Father. You came into this world as a child of a Father. Without the Father (and of course the mother, but the issue at hand here is all about the Father and His authority) you would not be here. The Father authors commands, rules, facts, and truth and enforces them. The child's nature is to lust after pleasure and hate restraint (missing out on pleasure). The child's nature is found in his heart, "deceitful and desperately wicked," thinking pleasure is the 'purpose' of life, therefore hating anyone getting in his way. The problem comes when the father (thinking and acting as a child) never grows up, lusting after pleasure instead of doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth that he KNOWS are right, holding his children accountable to the same.

Jeremiah 17:9 "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?"

The Father's means of communication, which is discussion is different than the child's, which is dialogue. In discussion the Father has the final say (God is God). It is an issue of being told what is right and what is wrong behavior according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. In dialogue the child has the final say (the child is God). It is an issue of stimulus-response, the approaching of pleasure and the avoiding of pain that the world is stimulating (imagined or real). One is objective truth, where truth is external to the child's carnal nature, needing to be heard, accepted, and applied or obeyed while the other is subjective truth, of the child's carnal nature, with the child 'justifying' himself, his lusts, doing what he feels like doing instead. When it comes to behavior which one the child turns to, discussion or dialogue determines who directs his paths (or steps). If the child is still dialoguing with himself after having had a discussion with the Father he did not hear what the Father said. Those "of and for the world," when it comes to behavior side with the child. Communicating through dialogue they 'justify' the child's lusts. Negating the Father's authority in the mind of the child they are then able to use the child to satisfy their lusts. We are now a nation of children (in adult bodies), making behavior subject to dialogue, 'justifying' lust (even in the "church"), negating the Father's authority, facing damnation on judgment day.

Luke 16:15 "And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12: "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."

Jeremiah 10:23 "... it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." Matthew 12:50 "For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." 1 John 2:16, 18 "For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." "And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever." Matthew 23:9 "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." John 5:30 "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." John 12:47-50 "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." Matthew 7:21 "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven."

Beyond short (if you want to know more).

While the earthly father is not perfect, he may be or may have been a tyrant or MIA or AWOL, the office he occupies (or was supposed to occupy) is perfect, having been given to him by the Heavenly Father in which to do His will. The "new" world order is based upon children lusting after pleasure, hating restraint 'creating' a world void of the Father's authority so they can do wrong, disobey, sin, that is lust without having a guilty conscience which the Father's authority engenders. While the Father (both earthly and heavenly) does not give his children commands, rules, facts, and truth and then tell them to compromise or "suspend" them if they get in the way of relationship with others, society does. Socialism, "the group" is dependent upon the child's natural inclination to lust after pleasure and hate restraint, which all children have in common, needing to 'liberate' the child from the Father's authority which causes division between the children, since each father of a family holds his children accountable to standards that differ from family to family (this is true for nations as well). As long as children remain loyal to their Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth (thus being labeled as being "prejudiced" by those "of and for the world"), holding others accountable to them as well, those who do wrong, disobey, sin, not doing the Father's will, those "of and for the world" will be judged, condemned, and cast out (will not be hired, will be fired, or will not be related with).

1 John 2:22 "He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son."

For the socialist, Marxist, Globalist, those "of and for the world," having rejected the Heavenly Father's authority (believing the Heavenly Father's authority is the result of children recognizing and honoring their earthly father's authority in the home), the only way they can rule over the world is to destroy the father's authority in the home. Where are the fathers in the home today, not only in the "white" family but in the "black" family as well? I KNOW, those "of and for the world" having drawn the children into dialogue when it comes to behavior, thus 'justifying' their lusts, have, in the mind of the children negated the father's God given right of authority, in order for the facilitator of 'change' to sin without having a guilty conscience, with the children's affirmation. While the Father's authority engenders individualism (under God), as the result of each child personally being held accountable for his thoughts and actions by the Father (in the light of His established commands, rules, facts, and truth) socialism is founded upon children finding their identity in "the group," in compromise. There are generally speaking two apposing groups of socialists, with a broad spectrum in between. While both depend upon "the group," that is society, one still holds onto a Father's authority system (why the Catholic "church" so quickly acquiescent to Fascism). The difference between Fascism and Globalism, traditional and transformational Communism or traditional and transformational Marxism is the latter depends upon dialogue when it comes to behavior. It is the latter that has now taken over the world. When the "Berlin wall" came down everyone thought communism was defeated when in fact it has succeeded, traditional Communism, hard line Marxism (equated to Fascism or National Socialism) was defeated while transformational Communism, Globalism, those who merged Marxism and psychology succeeded.

"As the Frankfurt School wrestled with how to 'reinvigorate Marx', they 'found the missing link in Freud.'" (Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923-1950)

When you make behavior subject to dialogue, where you have to "suspend" (as upon a cross) what the Father says for the sake of relationship you have laid the foundation for socialism, having to silence, censor, cast out (martyr) anyone who insists upon everyone doing the Father's will. Whenever you attempt to have a discussion (the true meaning of the word) in an environment of dialogue you will "always" be perceived as being argumentative ("negative") needing to be silent, participate in dialogue (be "positive"), or leave. From the garden in Eden, where the "children" were supposed to do the "Father's" will, that is to do what they were told, to Noah's son's who were suppose to scatter, maintaining the Father's authority system in the home, depending upon God wherever the went, Abraham who was to leave his earthly father behind, the children of Israel who were not to intermarry, maintaining the father's authority system within the culture to the framing of the Constitution and the "Bill of Rights" which did not get rid of the King, as all socialist countries do but made the father in the home King, ruling over his family, property, and business according to his convictions, creating the next generation of citizens to know right from wrong when it comes to behavior from being told, having a guilty conscience when they did wrong, disobeyed, or sinned. As the result of Marxist's using dialogue (psychology and Marxism, while one deals with the individual and the other with society are the same in that both negate the Father's authority in the individual and in "the group," directly effecting their actions or behavior) to establish policy, make rules and law from the Federal level down to the local community, along with the schools they were able to remove the Father's authority from the classroom, replacing it with the "feelings" of the student's, resulting in the facilitator of 'change' "owning" them, now in control of society.

Traditional education is based upon the Father's authority system where the teacher 1) preaches established commands and rules to be obeyed as given, teaches established facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith and applied, and discusses with the students any question(s) they might have regarding the commands, rules, facts, and truth they are being taught, at the teachers discretion (providing the teacher deems it necessary, has time, the students are able to understand, and are not questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority), 2) rewards the students who do what is right and obey, 3) corrects and-or chastens the student who does wrong and-or disobeys, that he might learn to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the established commands, rules, facts, and truth he is been taught, and 4) casts out (grounds or expels) any student who questions, challenges, defies, disregards, attacks the authority system just described.

Transformational education is based upon the soviet system where the facilitator of 'change' divides the students into groups, with each group having to include a deviant-immoral student (the true meaning of diversity), insisting upon all students being "positive," that is tolerant of the deviant-immoral student's behavior and not "negative," insisting upon him doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, dialoguing their opinions to a consensus (there is no Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process, there is only the expression and 'justification' of the students' self interests, their lusts of the 'moment' that the situation and-or the other students are stimulating along with their rejecting of any student causing division by insisting the deviant-immoral student repent and do what is right according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth), over social issues (or socialist issues, where individualism, under God is replaced with social worth—where the individual has no value outside of the social cause of the 'moment,' the purpose for the "group grade"), to a pre-determined outcome (that no rule, policy, or law effecting behavior is to be made without the soviet system, that is the consensus process, incorporating the deviant-immoral students behavior in the outcome, preventing the Father's authority system from establishing rules, policies, or laws regarding behavior).

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain; (Traditional Education VS. Bloom's "Taxonomies")

By removing discussion, where the teacher has the final say replacing it with dialogue, where the student's have the final say when it comes to behavior the father's authority in the home has been destroyed. Children (including those in adult bodies) now do what they want when they want without having a guilty conscience, making them servants of facilitator's of 'change,' following after them, supporting them with their time and money, defending them, protecting them, praising them, worshiping them, even willingly dying for them for 'justifying' their lusts. When you leave God out of your academics you are Godless, creating a Godless home, neighborhood, state, nation, and "church" (no matter your "church" affiliation).

In the following issues I use quotations by those "of and for the world," exposing them by the Word of God to make this clear. Having lectured (as a guest speaker) in California 'liberal' Universities (do I have to add 'liberal'), using PowerPoint, exposing the dialectic process with the Word of God, shoving the professors, at least what they were teaching their students down the hole of an outhouse (I asked Paul Garibaldi, who set these lectures up how he even got me in there to speak, with his response being "through much prayer and fasting") with the professors always responding when I finished, "We can not refute a word you said" in front of the hundreds of students present.

Contact: deangotcher@gmail.com